Scientology pages index  |  Contact

Scientology: Is its true history being exposed?  or       Independent publications that confirm various crucial elements of the tale as suggested on this website (‘Watergate: The Hoax’ (2016) by Ashton Gray)

(to other Scientology pages)

1) G e n e r a l   o v e r v i e w / i n t r o d u c t i o n :   M i s s i o n   s t a t e m e n t ,   o v e r v i e w ,   r e s e a r c h   s p e c i f i c s I n t r o d u c t i o n   t o   S c i e n t o l o g y   a n d   L R H K e e p i n g   S c i e n t o l o g y   W o r k i n g ,   f u n d a m en t al s S c i e n t o l o g y   i n   m e d i a   a nd   I n t e r n e t   ( +   f o r u m s ,   W i k i p e d i a ) S c i e n t o l o g y :   I t s   t r u e   h i s t o r y   e x p o s e d ? S c i e n t o l o g y   Q & A   ( F A Q ) E x t e r n a l   l i n k s M a t e r i a l s   w a n t   l i s t R e c o m m e n d e d   l i s t   o f   m a t e r i a l s 2) R e s p o n s e s   ( w i t h   a n n o t a t i o n s ) : A p p r e c i a t i v e   r e s p o n s e s   t o   m y   p a g e s C r i t i q u e   r e c e i v e d   ( 1 )   f r o m   c h u r c h g o i n g   S c i e n t o l o g i s t s C r i t i q u e   r e c e i v e d   ( 2 )   f r o m   o u t - o f - c h u r c h   S c i e n t o l o g i s t s C r i t i q u e   r e c e i v e d    ( 3 )   f r o m   a n t i - S c i e n t o l o g i s t s 3) T o p i c s   o f   p a r t i c u l a r   i n t e r e s t : (a): G e n e r a l   t o p i c s H o l y   S c r i p t u r e s   v s   S c i e n t o l o g y L R H   v s   D i c t i o n a r i e s L R H   v s   t h e o r y   o f   e v o l u t i o n L R H ' s   w o r k s   o f   f i c t i o n (b): O r g a n i z a t i o n a l   t o p i c s A   p r i n t i n g   h i s t o r y   o f   t h e   m a t e r i a l s   o f   S c i e n t o l o g y S c i e n t o l o g y   M e m b e r s h i p :   H A S I   v s   I A S L R H   v s   p r i c i n g   p o l i c i e s T h e   c o p y r i g h t s   i s s u e   a n d   l i c e n s i n g (c): T e c h n i c a l   t o p i c s H i s t o r y   o f   G r a d e   C h a r t :   a )   G e n e r a l H i s t o r y   o f   G r a d e   C h a r t :   b )   D e t a i l e d ‘ C l e a r ’   d e f i n e d N E D   f o r   O T s T h e   ‘ P r i m a r y   R u n d o w n ’ 4) C o n t r o v e r s i a l   t o p i c s : M i s t a k e n   i d e a s   o f   ‘ E t h i c s ’   c l a r i f i e d T h e   F a i r    G a m e   L a w P r a c t i c e   o f   D i s c o n n e c t i o n S e c u r i t y   C h e c k i n g F r e e l o a d e r s   v s   E x - s t a f f   m e m b e r s T h e   ‘ R e h a b i l i t a t i o n   P r o j e c t   F o r c e ’   ( R P F ) 5) C h a n g e s   i n   t h e   f l o w   o f   ‘ i n f o r m a t i o n ’: (a): A l t e r a t i o n s   ( L R H   o r   n o n- L R H ? ) L R H   v s   A l t e r a t i o n s N o n - L R H   t u r n s   i n t o   L R H ?   &   P r o p o s a l   t o   s o l u t i o n T h e    ‘ C r a m m i n g   S e r i e s ’   -   L R H   o r   n o t   L R H ? B a s e d   o n   L R H   p u b l i c a t i o n s (b): G e n e r a l   o v e r v i e w L R H   v s   A   N e w   O r d e r   ( i n t r o d u c t i o n ) → A d m i n i s t r a t i v e   a n d    o r g a n i z a t i o n a l   m a t t e r s S e t u p   o f   t h e   p r i n t e d   m a t e r i a l s   ( 1 9 7 3 - 8 6 ) T h e   R T R C ,   t h e   u n i t   t h a t   w r o t e   L R H   i s s u e s   ( 1 9 7 3 - 8 2 ) T h e   d a w n i n g   o f   R T C   a n d   n e w   m a n a g e m e n t   ( 1 9 8 2 - 8 3 ) → T e c h n i c a l   m a t t e r s I n t r o d u c t i o n   t o   t h e   e v e n t   o f   l o s i n g   a   B r i d g e ) A n a l y s i s   o f   H C O B   “ T e c h   C o r r e c t i o n   R o u n d - u p ” L o s t   B r i d g e :   T e c h   c h a n g e s   d u r i n g   1 9 7 8 - 8 2 T h e   h i s t o r y   o f   t h e   o r i g i n a l   O T   V I I I ‘ G o l d e n   A g e   o f   T e c h ’   ( G A T )   a n a l y s i s D r i l l i n g   i n   S c i e n t o l o g y (c): T h e   m a t t e r   o f   D a v i d   M a y o S t o r y   o f   D a v i d   M a y o ‘ S O   E D   2 3 4 4   I n t’   a n a l y s i s T r a i n i n g   d r i l l s   ( T R s ) M a y o   r e f e r e n c e   l i s t 6) C o n s p i r a c i e s   -   I n   L .   R o n   H u b b a r d ' s   f o o t s t e p s S c i e n t o l o g y   v s   a   N e w   W o r l d   O r d e r → W h e r e   i s   L .   R o n   H u b b a r d ?   ( c h r o n o l o g y   o f   S c n   h i s t o r y ) W h e r e a b o u t s   o f   L .   R o n   H u b b a r d   c h r o n o l o g y T h e   e r a   o f   a d o r a t i o n ;   P r e s e n t a t i o n   o f   L .   R o n   H u b b a r d L .   R o n   H u b b a r d   i n t o   a r t i s t r y :   M u s i c   &   F i l m → W h e r e   i s   h i s   w i f e   a n d   f a m i l y ? S t o r y   o f   M a r y   S u e   H u b b a r d T h e   l a s t   s t a n d :   T h e   G u a r d i a n   O f f i c e 7) S c i e n t o l o g y   u n d e r   a t t a c k (a): A   p r e m e d i t a t e d   s e r i e s   o f   o c c u r r e n c e s ?   ( ’ 8 0 s   c o n s p i r a c y ) I n t r o d u c t i o n   &   R o n   D e W o l f G e r r y   A r m s t r o n g   ( ‘ a f f i r m a t i o n s ’ ) R u s s e l l   M i l l e r    ( ‘ B a r e - F a c e d   M e s s i a h ’ ) A   r e l i g i o n   c r e a t e d   f o r   t h e   m o n e y ? (b): B a t t l e s   f o u g h t   a n d   t h e   i n t e r n e t   ( 2 0 1 6 -   ) L e a h   R e m i n i :   S c i e n t o l o g y   a n d   t h e   A f t e r m a t h   ( T V   s h o w )

>> Do you want to help with preserving the original technology? <<  Consult my want list here!

Please note that words with an asterisk (*) are defined at the bottom of this page! Only first appearances are indicated.

	“Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;
	And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
		John 8:31-32

Basically a promotional page that intends to give attention to various efforts made by other people then myself that through their book publications do confirm various of my findings relating to what may be the real (undisclosed) story about L. Ron Hubbard and his creations the subject matter of Dianetics and Scientology.

 
Index:

		The disbelievers ... (a foreword)
	‘Watergate: The Hoax’ (2016) by Ashton Gray
		The Watergate? Why promoted on this website? Who is Ashton Gray?
		Promotional actions
			- ‘Amazon’: Watergate: The Hoax – May 28, 2016 (release date) - ‘Coast to Coast AM’: Interview - June 23, 2016 (1 to 3 a.m.)
		Additional information: ‘Chalet Reports’
	Xxx upcoming...
		Xx
		Xx
		Xx

The disbelievers ... (a foreword)

“Did you hear that? Are they for real?”

It would seem that a rather significant portion of the members of the human race suffer from some sort of disqualification to accept particular proven facts if they clash with that they either want to believe or already have taken as their favourite rocking horse. See, they just may want to ride that rocking horse, they really don't want to see what else is out there to see. Then if you persist in asking them to look at something else they'd either (1) say angrily “Let me play my rocking horse!!”, (2) make fun of you, or (3) they will make you suffer from ad hominem attacks. Oft there just doesn't seem to exist a middle way! At least this seems to be the case with particularly sensitive or emotionally charged topics like for example politics, religion and the likes.

Now, regarding such sensitive topics, anything that is out of the ordinary, and particularly anything that may clash with the officially authorized version of the tale will quickly be dismissed and circumscribed as conspiracy theories. In reality however that so labeled conspiracy theory too often appears a lot closer to the truth (when you are scrutinously factual about it) then the officially authorized version given out by governments!

No doubt various angles forwarded on this page, this website will be prompted with such reactions. It has been so in the past and it will be so again. And there have been quite a few. And this is all fine! Mind however that truth can only remain hidden such and so long, it appears to be gifted with that innate quality that it will stick its head up now and then, and then again. Now, are we going to push any of these controversial views on matters to the side at forehand or are we going to look at if we can make some sense out of them? So, when it comes to this website and also the publications that it suggests you may have a look at, do they fall under the category of so-called taletellers? Well, it is wholly up to you to determine if the claims and/or the suggestions that it makes are sufficiently backed up with verifiable and factual research. Thus it is up to each member of the human race to regard these or simply ignore these and judge based on their liking and personal preferences or not. Mind that this is just an invitation! With other words, you stand on your own feet and establish what is true to you by yourself, or join the comfortable (but cowardice oft illiterate) flock of the obedient authority submitting members of the human race. Que sera sera ...

So do mind that I only suggest you have a look at these writings. Surely I do not say you have to swallow blindly what they say. Are you prepared now? Are you in the right state of mind? Then here it goes ...

 
‘Watergate: The Hoax’ (2016) by Ashton Gray
 
The Watergate? Why promoted on this website? Who is Ashton Gray?

The Watergate? That scandal from 1972 that forced the then US president Nixon to resign his presidency prematurely? What does that got to do with the topic of Scientology? Well, a hell of a lot according to the researcher/writer of the book. Its first two chapters go in detail about a burglary into the Watergate that was not. Indeed, that was not! Then if the ‘burglars’ were not there, then where were they and what were they doing? Then chapter three advances into the Scientology connection. The writing proposes a take over of the organization (or more precisely to subjugate its intellectual property) in where L. Ron Hubbard had to either be taken out or at least discapacitated.

Of course this will raise various pertinent questions. For example:

• If there was no burglary then why had president Nixon had to be framed for it?
• In case there existed an intent to cover up a Scientology take over, then why needed this to be done with such measures as faking a Watergate break-in?
• What is the deal really with the Scientology thing? What importances to its technology and information may have been attributed? Or was it something else?

Indeed there does appear then to exist sufficient with recorded information to support the notion that something of particular value would be embodied within this subject matter called Scientology?! Why otherwise do we see these comprehensive efforts taken to suppress its original information and finally gain control over it, this by an apparent outside entity? Now, would you resort taking all these efforts with such measure if there was nothing to gain and/or to be made hidden?

Why is the writing interesting enough to get promoted here on this website?

The book suggests that L. Ron Hubbard was taken out in the year 1972. In my own studies I followed this so-called tech-line. While researching and tracking the internal publication line of the Church of Scientolgoy I found that something ended near the end of 1972, and something new started at the end of 1973. It is as if someone other than L. Ron Hubbard had taken control and started to now disrupt the technology that was announced to have reached its completion in 1970. This seems to have been slowly implemented, step by step, to then during 1978-82 culminating in a complete turnaround of this technology. The original setup of the technology was no more.

The writer of this book, Ashton Gray, approaches the issue of L. Ron Hubbard being around still or not being around, from a rather different angle and still does appear to come to this rather same notion that L. Ron Hubbard must have been taken out or somehow rendered discapacitated during 1972. It is an nteresting enough outset therefore to suggest a consultation of the things this book has to say.

You will have to make up your own mind about these concepts that are shared through this book. One should always keep in mind that information needs to be evaluated, if it is not, it turns in essence useless.

Who is Ashton Gray?

I find that this name is proposed being a pseudonym which is implied by a few persons out on the Internet. Some names are then suggested for who would be behind it. It is controversial information that is shared through this book, and so using a pseudonym may very well be warranted and justified for these reasons. It should not matter too much though as it is the information that is shared that should be considered. So, let's rather have this information speak for itself.

 
Promotional actions

• ‘Amazon’:  Watergate: The Hoax – May 28, 2016 (release date)
• ‘Coast to Coast AM’:  Interview - June 23, 2016 (1 to 3 a.m.)

 
‘Amazon’:  Watergate: The Hoax – May 28, 2016 (release date)

 
‘Coast to Coast AM’:  Interview - June 23, 2016 (1 to 3 a.m.)

 
Additional information: ‘Chalet Reports’

On the Chalet Books website you will find various further promotion and also a series of articles that were foregoing the release of the book. There were 12 in total and released during Oct. 31-Dec. 24, 2015. The person listed for these articles is David Reznor who is a research associate of Ashton Gray, although the work on these is a collaborative effort that involves several people. You will find the first of these articles here (external link, last checked: 26 Jun 2016).